All posts by Carolyn Remde

Lesson Plan: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle

Lesson by Cynthia Perez

Grade level: 3rd grade

Summary:  Students will learn about ways they can reduce, reuse, and recycle in order to protect their environment. First the students will learn and understand the meanings of reduce, reuse, and recycle. Then the students will discuss why it is important to reduce, reuse, and recycle and then will make a poster in which they will provide two ways in which they can reduce, reuse, and recycle.

Score: 14/18

 

Inclusivity of Multiple Perspectives: 1

Link to Real World Problems: 3

Differentiation: 3

Agents of Change: 2

Connections to Students’ Lives: 2

Lesson Assessment: 3

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Lesson

Lesson Plan: Bullying and Courage

Bullying and Courage

Lesson by Cynthia Perez

Grade level: 4th grade

Summary:  Students will learn about different situations where they would feel either safe or unsafe. Then, students will learn the different definitions of courage and bullying and have a class discussion about these two topics. Students will learn how to find these safe places in their schools, and how to discourage and stop bullying. The book “Courage” by Bernard Waber is used.

Score: 15.5/18

 

 

Inclusivity of Multiple Perspectives: 2.5

Link to Real World Problems: 3

Differentiation: 2

Agents of Change: 2.5

Connections to Students’ Lives: 3

Lesson Assessment: 2.5

Bullying 3rd Grade Lesson

Lesson Plan Resources

Here are some resources for lesson plans and social justice.

www.learningtogive.org

-More than 1,600 lessons for teachers. State standards included.

http://www.sacsc.ca/Elementary_Unit_and_Lesson_Plans.htm

– this site organizes content into units with social justice themes

http://www.tolerance.org/activities

-This site includes various lessons with social justice themes as well as links to additional resources related to the topic of each lesson

http://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plans

-Humanities lessons organized by subject, theme, and grade level

http://www.thinkfinity.org/?q=home

-Lesson plans filtered from various sources

http://www.lessonplanet.com/search?keywords=social+justice&media=lesson

-Lesson plans reviewed by teachers

www.kqued.org/w/mosaic/gaylesbian

-Lesson plans and resources

Lesson Plan Submissions

Call for Submissions:

Are you looking to publish your lesson plans?  Would you like to contribute to a database of great lessons?  This semester a small group of Urban Education Graduate students are editing the website Teaching 4 Change.  We’re looking for innovative lesson plans from all disciplines.  In particular, some of our team will be looking closely at the differentiation components of your lessons.  Your plan will be evaluated using this rubric and the best ones will be published right here!  The lesson should be in the accepted TCNJ format, found at http://www.tcnj.edu/~educat/documents/Lessonplanformat.pdf.  Students will receive full credit for their work and they will be contributing to a database full of lessons that can be used as exemplars for future students and the larger community.

The deadline for submissions this semester is October 31, 2012.  For questions or submissions please contact kelly54@tcnj.edu with the subject “Teaching 4 Change.”

Thank you!

Scoring Guide

Scoring: Four TCNJ students averaged the scores for each category on the rubric and added them together. We then rounded the total score. The highest possible score for each category is 3, making the highest possible total score 18. The overall scores equate to star ratings as follows:

1-7: 1 star

8-14: 2 stars

15-18: 3 stars

Lesson Plan: Classroom Footprint

Lesson Plan: Classroom Footprint

Link URL: http://www.sacsc.ca/PDF%20files/Elementary%20Lesson%20Plans/Global%20Education/Unit%2010/Classroom%20Footprint-Lyons-M%20SS%20LA%20S-4-6-L1%20.pdf

Summary: Through this lesson, students examine their individual ‘global footprint.’ In other words, students discover how much land and water is necessary to sustain what they use as well as discard. In doing so, students also discuss the quality of life, particularly how their quality of life compares to that of others, as well as what factors affect quality of life. This lesson includes various activities, specifically discussions which obtain data from the Earth Day Network Site, and graphing the ‘global footprint’ of the class, to be completed individually, in pairs, and as a whole class.

Advantages: This lesson effectively embeds social justice themes overall, and allows for singular as well as group work.

Disadvantages: Although the lesson differentiates instruction, provides a link to global issues related to the quality of life, and incorporates contributions from each student, the assessments do not fully evaluate students’ attainment of the lesson objectives.

Scores: 13.75/18, 3 stars

Inclusivity of multiple perspectives: 2.5

Link to real world problems: 2

Differentiation: 2

Agents of change: 2

Connections to students’ lives: 3

Lesson assessment: 2.25

Lesson Plan: A Day in the Life of a Child

A Day in the Life of a Child

URL:http://www.sacsc.ca/PDF%20files/Elementary%20Lesson%20Plans/Global%20Education/Unit%204/Personal%20Time%20Clocks-Clark-LA%20SS%20Math-3-1.pdf

 

Summary: For this lesson, the teacher will have students share how they spend their days and chart their activities. Afterwards, the teacher will ask students share how they spend their days and chart their activities. After, the teacher will ask students how these activities influence their lives and discuss their ideas. The teacher will then have students decide which activities are necessary for survival and which are not necessary for survival but still impact their quality of life. After this distinction has been established, the teacher will ask students to make a 24 hour time clock to determine their daily activities. Students will then do further examination of these activities to help them understand how they affect their geography, history and culture.

Advantages: The lesson incorporates different teaching styles, links to the real world, and connects to student’s lives directly.

Disadvantages: There are not many options for assessment, and the lesson does not stress being an agent of change.

Scores: 14/18, 2 stars

Inclusivity of multiple perspectives: 2/5

Link to real world problems: 2

Differentiation: 2.25

Agents of change: 2

Connects to students’ lives: 3

Lesson assessment: 2.25


	

Social Justice Terms and Definitions

Social Justice: Creating and advocating for equality in terms of political, socioeconomic, and social welfare. Social justice lessons focus around the idea that children should be aware of racial, gender-based, and socioeconomic discrimination and inequality. Also, the distribution of advantages and disadvantages in a society.

Differentiation: Varied instructional methods and activities for different student abilities and interests, to make different by modification.

Inclusivity: Including multiple perspectives, which often come from different races, genders, classes, etc. The fact or policy of not excluding numbers or participants on grounds of race, class, sexuality, disability, etc. An inclusive lesson is one that makes sure to look at an issue from different perspectives and factors in economic, racial or class when looking at an issue.

Agent: A person or thing that acts or has the power to act, a natural force or object producing or used for obtaining specific results.

 

 

 

Lesson Plan: Social Justice: Here! There! Now! Then!

Lesson Plan: Social Justice: Here! There! Now! Then!

Lesson Plan URL: http://learningtogive.org/lessons/unit232/

Grade: 9-12, though can be adapted by teachers for lower grades

Summary: Students will undergo 5 lessons in this unit. Students learn about social injustice, intolerance, and social needs. They will examine past and present situations of social injustice and finally come up with a plan to solve a social need. Lesson 1 examines social injustice in South Africa, Lesson 2 discusses the Jim Crow laws, Lesson 3 Civil rights leaders, Lesson 4 social justice rhetoric, and Lesson 5 identifying and acting upon a social need.

Positives: Students are given many different opportunities to study social injustice, and teachers can chose the parts of the lesson that they want to use. Different mediums are used, such as video, group discussion, writing, and actual community involvement.

Negatives: Differentiation is not discussed – changing the lesson based on student needs, and there are limited uses of assessments.

Score: 14.75/18, 3 Stars

Inclusivity of multiple perspectives: 2.25

Link to real world problems: 3

Differentiation: 1.75

Agents of change: 2.5

Connections to students’ lives: 2.25

Lesson assessment: 3

Research Articles and Abstracts

Done by Carolyn Remde

Weidman, C.R. (2002.) Teacher Preparation, Social Justice, Equity: A Review of the Literature. University of Massachusetts School of Education Journal, 35(3) 200-211.

Research Problem:
Social Justice is an important topic in the classroom, and it is often not covered by teachers. To overcome this, it is important that the current social justice education methods are examined, as well as teacher preparation methods. Furthermore, there are many different research theories and practices used in the classroom which are examined in the journal.

Research Questions:
The research questions were: “How are equity and social justice defined and conceptualized in the field of education, and why are equity and social justice key themes in education?” as well as questions asking about teacher education practices and the role of social justice and equity in these practices. Finally, the researchers asked how teachers were being supported “towards equity and social justice orientation” (Weidman 200.) Other implied questions were “how different theories are implemented in teacher education and in the classrooms” and “why are some schools unequal for students.”

Data Collection Procedure:
Weidman used social justice research to explore the different theories discussed. Also, studies have been made from experiences with pre-service and in-service teachers in relation to social justice, diversity, and equality. Teachers also seemed to not approve of social justice education or be very resistant to the idea of it, as found during Weidman’s work in the field. For the most part, not much data collection was made.

Findings:
It was found that it is critical to improve efforts to teach educators about social justice and community issues. There are many gaps in the research about social justice, and there needs to be more clear documentation of the impact of social justice education on teachers. In order to be a successful teacher of social justice, teachers should learn and implement different theories of social justice education, provide consistent social justice education in their lessons, and engage in discussions and analysis about social justice. Reflection about social justice, power and inequalities should be commonly discussed amongst students and teachers. Teaching for social justice was found to help students develop analytical skills that would help them in their school and professional careers. Finally, different theories such as multicultural education were examined – and despite their effectiveness or ineffectiveness, it was found to be important to not approach multicultural and equality education as ‘color blind’, but to discuss the deep-rooted issues of racism and inequality.


Duncan-Andrade, Jeffrey M.R. (2005.) Developing Social Justice Educators. Educational Leadership Journal, 70-73.

Research Problem:
Many urban students are not getting the education they need or deserve, and many teachers do not know how to teach social justice in the classroom. There are some effective teachers in urban schools that seem to adequately meet the needs of their students. Duncan-Andrade finds that much of their success comes from their implementation of social justice pedagogy in the classroom, and seeks to find out exactly how social justice teaching has affected the learning and success of the students being taught.

Research Questions:
The questions being asked are how social justice can affect and improve teaching in urban schools, and how urban schools can adjust to create environments in which teachers can learn and improve upon one another.

Data Collection Procedure:
Three successful teachers at Power Elementary School in Los Angeles were studied: Ms. Grant, Ms. Kim, and Mr. Truong. There was also a teacher inquiry group set up at the school as a three-year program whose purpose was to implement social justice in teacher’s lessons and for teachers to be able to support one another.

Findings:
The three successful teachers were found to have achieved success through their social justice pedagogy, and by helping students implement change in their communities. When students feel empowered to change inequality in their communities, they are more motivated to learn. They can do this by thinking critically about the issues in their communities and trying to solve them constructively, whether it be a letter to the mayor or a protest about selling guns. Another method that helps teachers in urban schools is collaboration with their colleagues. If teachers have a support system, they are much more likely to do well and feel as if they are supported. Teachers should make reflections on their teaching and meet with other teaching professionals, as well as ask for support if needed.


Duncan-Andrade, Jeffrey M.R. (2004.) Toward Teacher Development for the Urban in Urban Teaching. Educational Leadership Journal, (15,4) (339-350.)

Research Problem:
The article recognizes the need of teacher development, support and retention. It states that the low rate of teacher retention is a major issue today. Also, teachers need to work together in order to understand their student’s struggles and correctly address them. There needs to be greater teacher preparation and support for the unique challenges that teachers face in urban schools.

Research Questions:
The article seeks to find out how teacher support groups can lead to more effective teaching and professional development. Another question is “how can teachers address their students in a way that will engage them and bring hope to their community and personal struggles?”

Data Collection Procedure:
Research was done by teacher inquiries at Power Elementary School as well as looking at existing research. A critical inquiry group was formed and observed; it was made up of seven teachers who participated in the program for 3 years.

Findings:
A 2003 NCTAF report revealed a lack of effective teacher support, both pedagogically and in the urban realm itself. Through the test ‘critical inquiry group’, teachers and their methods were observed. In the group, teachers thought critically about their students and the issues surrounding the school. When teachers worked together in solving problems and learned from one another, they were able to discuss issues and ways to move theory and discussion into action to help their students. Also, they realized that issues in the community greatly impacted their students. If the teachers used issues in the community as a springboard for teaching, such as data collecting, students were more interested in the material. Finally, teachers felt better supported and more empowered when they worked alongside their colleagues to create critical inquiry lessons and understand social issues in the classroom.